Meta’s Behemoth Delay: A Sign of AI’s Toughest Frontier?

By Jim Lundy

 

Meta’s Behemoth Delay: A Sign of AI’s Toughest Frontier?

The pursuit of ever more capable Artificial Intelligence models has become a central focus and massive investment area for leading technology companies. However, recent reports indicate that even the giants face significant hurdles. The Wall Street Journal broke a story about Meta delaying the rollout of its flagship “Behemoth” AI model, amidst internal concerns about its progress despite substantial investment, brings into question the current state and immediate future of cutting-edge large language model development. This blog overviews the reported delays at Meta and other leading AI labs and analyzes what these developments signify for the broader AI landscape.

Why the Behemoth Delay and Internal Unease?

Meta’s ambition to develop a top-tier large language model capable of competing with or exceeding those from rivals like OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic has been well-documented, backed by billions in capital expenditure aimed at realizing CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s AI vision. Internally dubbed “Behemoth,” this next-generation model was reportedly targeted for release as early as April, coinciding with a major developer conference. However, according to individuals familiar with the situation, engineers have encountered difficulties achieving significant performance improvements over previous Llama models.

These struggles have led to internal questions about whether the incremental gains justify a public release, pushing the target timeline first to June, and now reportedly to the fall or potentially later. The delays have reportedly caused frustration among senior Meta executives, leading to contemplation of management changes within the AI product group responsible for the Llama 4 models. This internal pressure highlights a gap between public statements about Behemoth’s purported leading capabilities and the practical challenges faced in training and refining the model to meet performance expectations. While Meta could release a more limited version, the reported internal concerns underscore a challenge in achieving the hoped-for breakthrough performance.

Analysis: Hitting the Headwinds of Scale

The reported delays surrounding Meta’s Behemoth model, while specific to the company, appear symptomatic of broader challenges currently facing the industry’s pursuit of frontier AI models. The parallel delays reported for OpenAI’s GPT-5 and Anthropic’s Claude 3.5 Opus suggest that pushing the boundaries of large language model capabilities is becoming increasingly difficult and resource-intensive.

This pattern aligns with the perspective that achieving significant, step-function improvements in AI models may be slowing down, despite continued massive investment in compute and talent. As models scale further, the complexity of training, fine-tuning, and ensuring reliable, improved performance appears to increase disproportionately to the gains achieved. The internal frustrations and potential management shifts at Meta underscore the immense pressure within these organizations to demonstrate tangible progress and return on the billions invested in AI research and development.

Furthermore, the reported issues with the Llama 4 team and concerns about the accuracy of benchmark performance relative to publicly released models (as seen with earlier Llama versions) point to potential organizational or process challenges that can hinder the reliable and timely delivery of advanced AI capabilities. The departure of many researchers from the original Llama team could also be a factor impacting the continuity and speed of development on subsequent generations. These delays and internal challenges across leading labs suggest that the immediate future of AI advancements might involve more incremental improvements at a higher cost, rather than continuous, dramatic leaps forward.

What Should Enterprises Do About This News?

For enterprises closely watching the advancements in AI models, these reported delays at major players like Meta, OpenAI, and Anthropic carry important implications. They serve as a realistic reminder that the bleeding edge of AI development is complex, unpredictable, and subject to significant timelines shifts.

As Aragon has documented in the past, Meta and Facebook will not indemnify your enterprise if you use any of their LLMs, such as Llama 3 or Llama 4. This suggests that other providers should be selected until they do.

Bottom Line

Meta’s reported delay of its Behemoth AI model and the accompanying internal concerns reflect the increasing technical hurdles and financial pressures inherent in pushing the frontier of large language models. This situation, mirrored by delays at other leading AI labs, suggests that the pace of significant AI model advancements may be moderating, and future gains could come at a higher cost. For enterprises, the key takeaway is to maintain a pragmatic approach to AI Provider selection. See our Aragon Research published research for more advice on this topic.

 

 

 

 

Upcoming Webinars

 

 

Coaching, Sales and Support: Are AI Agents Ready for Primetime

AI Agents are here and with it comes an increasing set of Agents that can perform tasks. While more showing up everyday, in this webinar we are going to review the current state of AI Agents for Sales, Support and Coaching. Join Aragon Founder and CEO Jim Lundy as he does a review of the current state of AI Agents and their ability to support humans doing these roles.

Key things discussed:

• What are the trends driving AI Agents?
• What is the current state of AI Agents in Sales, Service and Coaching and what vendors are making a difference?
• How can enterprises gain a competitive Advantage with AI Agents?

 

Register Today