Demystifying Chatbots, Assistants, Copilots Versus Agents
Demystifying Chatbots, Assistants, Copilots vs. Agents
I was speaking with a client today about their AI plans, and I found us getting tangled up in AI terms. It’s easy to get lost in the jargon. Terms like “chatbots,” “assistants,” “copilots,” and “agents” are often used interchangeably, creating confusion among both end-users and technology providers.
Much of this confusion stems from the overlapping functionalities of these AI entities and the lack of clear industry standards for defining them. Additionally, marketing hype and the constant push for innovation can further blur the lines between these terms.
So how do we differentiate these technologies?
How Do I Know What I Need?
While these AI systems share the common goal of enhancing human-computer interaction, they differ in their level of sophistication, autonomy, and intended use. To bring clarity, let’s define each term based on its primary function and level of autonomy:
- Agents: Agents represent the next generation of what we used to call Chatbots. An agent is a much more advanced form of what was formerly referred to as Chatbots. Like an Assistant, an Agent is designed to simulate human-like conversations through text or speech. As Aragon predicted Virtual Agents can now have many new roles that use a conversational interface as a given. Examples of new Agents include Coaching Agents from providers like Bigtincan, Cresta, Seismic, RingCentral, and Salesforce. Another example of a Virtual Agent is Agent Assist for Contact Center Agents. These Virtual Agents help the human agent answer questions and find information in real time based on the conversation being held.
- Assistants: An AI Assistant can often be called a Copilot. Assistants work alongside humans, providing suggestions, insights, and support in real time. They are often used in creative or complex tasks, such as software development, where human judgment and expertise are still essential. Examples of things that Assistants do include writing, summarizing, capturing action items or even generating images or graphics. Assistants also use a Conversational Interface and these are often provided by a technology provider. Going forward Assistants will be fine-tuned to address specific use cases and domains of application. For example one major provider has a number of assistants it is planning to rollout for both networking and security. Google and Microsoft both offer Office assistants and others such as Adobe and Canva offer creative assistants.
Level of Training and Management Investment
A big difference is the short- and long-term training and management required.
- Next generation agents will be able to learn from your content or information but will still require extensive training to handle complex decision-making, risk assessment, and autonomous actions. Management involves closely monitoring performance, ensuring adherence to ethical guidelines, and implementing robust error-handling mechanisms.
- Basic Agents such as those for FAQ-style responses require a low level of training.. Ongoing management involves monitoring performance, updating knowledge base, and addressing user feedback.
- Assistants need training on a broader range of tasks, understanding user context, and integrating with external services. The ability of assistants to remember a user or the information in an enterprise is one of the trends we see coming for 2025. Training users on techniques such as advanced prompting will help to ensure high quality results. Many enterprises will want to evaluate providers based on the Integration that is offered with various third party platforms.
- Industry specific Assistants require a high degree of specialized training in specific domains (e.g., coding, design, writing) to provide relevant suggestions and insights. Management needs to focus on measuring performance, refining suggestions, and adapting to evolving workflows.
Bottom line
Understanding the nuances between AI assistants/copilots, and agents, increase the potential impact and value from AI investments and reduce the risks of wasted investments.
- End-users need to know what to expect from different AI systems and choose the right one for their needs. You must actively research and evaluate AI for your business needs and solutions before adopting them, paying close attention to their functionalities and limitations.
- Like End-users, technology providers must ensure they are defining their future business state and business model to pick the right technology to support their business. Technology providers need to clearly communicate the capabilities and limitations of their products to avoid setting unrealistic expectations.
Check out Aragon’s Upcoming Webinar
Key Trends Impacting the Evolution of LLMs
It has been over a year since the release of ChatGPT, and now we are seeing an entire market of providers emerge to compete in LLM software offerings. What
do you need to know now?
During this webinar, we will explore emerging trends in large language model development and provide actionable advice for enterprises considering an investment in LLMs.
• Why are LLMs so critical for the evolution of Artificial Intelligence systems?
• What are the major trends impacting the LLM market?
• How will this market continue to evolve over the next 3-5 years?
Join our Experts for Aragon’s September Transform Tour!
Whether you’re a seasoned AI practitioner, a business leader looking to stay ahead of the curve, or simply curious about the future of technology, this virtual event is your chance to gain early access to critical insights that will shape 2025 and beyond.
This isn’t just another trends forecast. Join our expert analysts and women-in-tech panel for:
- Women-In-Tech Guest Panel: Communication in the Age of AI
- Predictions for 2025: The AI Big Bang: From AI Technologies to AI Business Strategies
- AI Assistants: On Your Phone or in the Cloud
Have a Comment on this?